Paul Raczkowski v. Tc Construction Company, Inc., a California Corporation and Does I Through C, Inclusive

Good Law
8 F.3d 29·1993 WL 385483·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 34047
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 30, 199391-56536California804 words

Opinion

Opinion

8 F.3d 29 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Paul RACZKOWSKI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TC CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., a California corporation; and Does I through C, inclusive Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-56536. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 10, 1993. * Decided Sept. 30, 1993. Before: KOZINSKI, SILER, ** and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM *** 2 Raczkowski worked as a box-builder for TC Construction Company. He sued TC under the Federal Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et. seq. for unpaid wages. After a bench trial, the district court made findings of fact and entered a judgment for TC. We affirm. None of the findings of fact was clearly erroneous. 3 We review the district court's findings of fact for clear error and its interpretation of the Fair Labor Standards Act de novo. Drollinger v. State of Arizona, 962 F.2d 956, 958 (9th Cir.1992). A. Commuting Time 4 The Portal-to-Portal Act provides that employers are…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.