Ronald Reynolds v. Steven Suckow

8 F.3d 29 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ronald REYNOLDS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Steven SUCKOW, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-35083. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 3, 1993. * Decided Sept. 16, 1993. Before: BROWNING, SCHROEDER, and HALL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 The appellant, Ronald Reynolds, appearing pro se, filed a complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1983 against Steven Suckow, a corrections officer at the Washington State Penitentiary in Walla Walla, Washington. Reynolds alleged that Suckow threatened and harassed him in retaliation for Reynolds' use of the prison grievance process. Attached to Reynolds' complaint was evidence of a cell search and minor disciplinary actions taken by Suckow against Reynolds. Reynolds believes that the disciplinary actions and cell search resulted only from Suckow's desire to retaliate against Reynolds. 3 Suckow filed a motion for summary judgment. The magistrate judge granted…