Robert R. Parker, Jr. v. Betty J. Reynolds Oregon Government Ethics Commission

8 F.3d 29 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert R. PARKER, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Betty J. REYNOLDS; Oregon Government Ethics Commission, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-36315. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 6, 1993. * Decided Oct. 21, 1993. Before: BEEZER, KOZINSKI, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Robert Parker, Jr., appeals pro se the district court's denial of his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion to reinstate his complaint in his civil rights action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review for an abuse of discretion, Floyd v. Laws, 929 F.2d 1390, 1400 (9th Cir.1991), and affirm. 3 "An appeal from the denial of a Rule 60(b) motion brings up the denial of the motion for review, not the merits of the underlying judgment." Id. Pursuant to Rule 60(b), a court may relieve a party from judgment for the following reasons: (1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (2) newly…