Stephen G. Ramberg v. City of Portland, a Municipal Corporation Ray Hjelte Edward Wilson, Individually and in Their Official Capacities

8 F.3d 29 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Stephen G. RAMBERG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF PORTLAND, a municipal corporation; Ray Hjelte; Edward Wilson, individually and in their official capacities, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-35382. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 2, 1993. Decided Oct. 7, 1993. Before: BROWNING, SCHROEDER, and HALL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Stephen G. Ramberg appeals from the district court's entry of judgment in favor of defendants on his claims of wrongful discharge, retaliatory discharge and violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . Because we conclude the district court could have directed a verdict for defendants, we do not find it necessary to address each issue presented in this appeal. See Davis & Cox v. Summa Corp., 751 F.2d 1507, 1517 (9th Cir.1985). 3 Ramberg contends that his discharge occurred because he voiced his opposition to sex discrimination within the Portland Fire…