Ronald Reynolds v. D. Potts

8 F.3d 29 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ronald REYNOLDS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. D. POTTS, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-35174. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 3, 1993. * Decided Sept. 17, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington, No. CV-92-CS-100-CI; Cynthia Imrogno, Magistrate Judge, Presiding. E.D.Wash. AFFIRMED. Before: BROWNING, SCHROEDER, and HALL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ronald Reynolds (Reynolds), appeals pro se the district court's granting summary judgment for defendant D. Potts (Potts), a mailroom employee of the Washington State Penitentiary (WSP), in Reynolds' 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against Potts alleging that Potts restricted delivery of Reynolds' mail in violation of his rights under the First Amendment. 3 The following facts are undisputed: On January 22, 1992, Reynolds' wife sent him a large manila envelope containing a $30.00 money order, photos,…