Schraeger v. City of San Francisco

8 F.3d 29 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Barbara SCHRAEGER; Sheila Purcell, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Claude Everhart, Art Agnos, Maggie Jacobsen, San Francisco Labor-Management Work Improvement Project, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-15554. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 9, 1993. Decided Sept. 16, 1993. Before SNEED, POOLE, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Appellants challenge the district court's disposal of their § 1983 cause of action by a summary judgment on their First Amendment claim based on the absence of municipal liability and a dismissal of their due process claim based on the absence of a constitutionally protected property interest. We affirm the district court. I. FACTS AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS 3 In 1980, the City of San Francisco and the public employee unions signed a Letter of Commitment to establish the Work Improvement Plan (WIP), a neutral nonprofit…