Lester Tellis v. S. Godinez

8 F.3d 30 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Lester TELLIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. S. GODINEZ, et al., Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-16296. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 6, 1992. * Decided Sept. 28, 1993. Before: GOODWIN, FARRIS and PREGERSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 In a published opinion filed concurrently with this memorandum, a majority of this panel held that the district court erred in its interpretation of Nevada Revised Statute 209.241 when it ruled that Tellis had no protected property interest in the interest earned on his funds placed on deposit in the Nevada "prisoners' personal property fund." See Tellis v. Godinez, No. 91-16296 (9th Cir. Aug. __, 1993). The facts of this case are set out in that opinion. 3 In this memorandum, we address Tellis' argument that he was entitled to access to the $163.72 of his money placed in the fund, and that he was denied his right of meaningful access to the courts by prison…