Nathan Kevin Turner v. Joseph Compoy, Warden Attorney General of the State of California

8 F.3d 30 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Nathan Kevin TURNER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Joseph COMPOY, Warden; Attorney General of the State of California, Respondents-Appellees. No. 91-55842. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 8, 1993. * Decided Oct. 19, 1993. Before: BROWNING, POOLE, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Nathan Kevin Turner, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition. Turner challenges his conviction and sentence on multiple counts of rape, burglary, robbery, assault, and peeping tom activity. We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253 , and we review de novo. Norris v. Risley, 878 F.2d 1178, 1180 (9th Cir.1989). We affirm. 1 3 * Turner contends that the trial court should have excluded as involuntary certain inculpatory statements he made to the police because he was under the influence…