United States v. Jason Allison

Good Law
8 F.3d 30·1993 WL 425966·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 35382
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 21, 199392-16968California866 words

Opinion

Opinion

8 F.3d 30 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jason ALLISON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-16968. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 6, 1993. * Decided Oct. 21, 1993. Before BEEZER, KOZINSKI, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jason Allison appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate his sentence imposed following his guilty plea to manufacture of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1), and use of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c)(1). Allison contends that (1) he received ineffective assistance of counsel because his attorney successfully moved to postpone his sentencing hearing, with the result that he was sentenced under the United States Sentencing Guidelines rather than pre-Guidelines law, (2) his Guidelines sentence violated his plea bargain, and (3) he is entitled to a downward…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.