Taylor v. Rohr Industries, Inc.

8 F.3d 30 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jimmy TAYLOR; Robert Goins; Robert Rodriguez; Mary Gonzales, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ROHR INDUSTRIES, INC.; International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers; District Lodge No. 120 and De Anza Lodge No. 964, AFL-CIO; Pinkerton's, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-55063. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 11, 1993. * Decided Sept. 30, 1993. Before: KOZINSKI, SILER, ** and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM *** 2 Plaintiffs appeal the entry of summary judgment against them. For the following reasons, we affirm the district court. Background 3 Plaintiffs were terminated for violating employee standards of conduct at Rohr Industries, Inc., for knowingly receiving pay for time not worked. The Union participated in both the investigation and the grievance process attendant to the disciplinary action taken against the plaintiffs. First, Union representatives attended…