United States v. Ramsey Matthew Bridges

8 F.3d 31 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ramsey Matthew BRIDGES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-30021. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 20, 1993. * Decided Sept. 29, 1993. Before: FLETCHER, POOLE, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ramsey Matthew Bridges appeals from his conviction following his conditional guilty plea to possession with intent to distribute cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). Bridges contends that the district court erred by denying his motion to suppress cocaine and other evidence seized during a search for false identification documents because (1) the search warrant was not supported by probable cause and (2) the search was a pretext for a narcotics search. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 " 'The standard of review for the issuance of a search warrant requires us to examine whether the…