United States v. Rob William Gray, AKA John Doe

8 F.3d 31 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rob William GRAY, aka John Doe, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50167. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 6, 1993. * Decided Oct. 21, 1993. Before: BEEZER, KOZINSKI, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM ** Robert William Gray appeals his 51-month sentence imposed following entry of his guilty plea to unarmed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a). Gray contends that the district court erred by (1) making an upward adjustment in his offense level for obstruction of justice and (2) denying him a downward adjustment for acceptance of responsibility. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. * Obstruction of Justice Gray contends that the district court erred by finding that he obstructed justice based upon his refusal to reveal his true identity. This argument lacks merit. We review for clear error a…