United States v. Charles Andrew Griesemer

8 F.3d 31 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles Andrew GRIESEMER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10364. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 13, 1993. * Decided Oct. 5, 1993. 1 Before: POOLE and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges, and KELLEHER, Senior District Judge ** 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Charles Andrew Griesemer appeals his convictions for conspiracy and possession with intent to distribute marijuana arising from his arrest at a marijuana stash house. We affirm. DISCUSSION 4 A. Disclosure of Confidential Informant. 5 In balancing defendant's interest in preparing his defense against society's interest in protecting the flow of information, the court considers three factors: "(1) the degree of the informant's involvement in the criminal activity; (2) the relationship between the defendant's asserted defense and the likely testimony of the informant; and (3) the government's interest in…