United States v. Gerardo Gutierrez-Meza, United States of America v. Ramon Fierro-Gaxiola

Good Law
8 F.3d 31·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 35391
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 7, 199392-30435California1,179 words

Opinion

Opinion

8 F.3d 31 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gerardo GUTIERREZ-MEZA, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ramon FIERRO-GAXIOLA, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 91-30411, 92-30435. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 2, 1993. * Decided Oct. 7, 1993. Before: BROWNING, SCHROEDER, and HALL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ramon Fierro-Gaxiola and Gerardo Gutierrez-Meza were both members of a twelve person heroin trafficking conspiracy. Gutierrez appeals the denial of his motion for mistrial due to improper statements of a government witness. Fierro appeals the denial of his motion to dismiss for violation of the Speedy Trial Act and appeals the sentence imposed after his conditional guilty plea. Both Gutierrez and Fierro appeal the denial of a motion to suppress evidence obtained during an alleged search and seizure. 3 The issues raised in Gutierrez' appeal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.