United States v. Ramiro Gomez-Gutierrez

8 F.3d 31 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ramiro GOMEZ-GUTIERREZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50143. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 6, 1993. * Decided Oct. 20, 1993. Before: BEEZER, KOZINSKI and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ramiro Gomez-Gutierrez appeals his conviction, following a conditional guilty plea, for unlawful reentry into the United States after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (a), (b)(1) and (b)(2). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Gomez-Gutierrez's counsel submitted a brief stating that he finds no arguable issues for review and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988), discloses no issue for review. Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED. * The panel unanimously…