United States v. Joel Munoz-Pulido

8 F.3d 32 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joel MUNOZ-PULIDO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50128. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 20, 1993. * Decided Oct. 7, 1993. Before: FLETCHER, POOLE and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Joel Munoz-Pulido appeals his 21-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to conspiracy to possess marijuana with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 , 846. Munoz-Pulido contends the district court erred by granting him only a one-level reduction in his offense level pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 for being a minor participant in the offense. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we vacate and remand. 3 We review de novo a district court's construction and interpretation of the Guidelines section on a defendant's role in the offense, United States v. Zweber, 913 F.2d 705, 708 (9th Cir.1990),…