United States v. Daniel L. Norman

8 F.3d 32 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel L. NORMAN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-30045. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 2, 1993. Decided Oct. 21, 1993. Before: WRIGHT, BEEZER and HALL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Norman challenges his drug and money laundering convictions under 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1), 856 and 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (a)(1)(B)(i), his conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm under 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g), and his sentence to 360 months imprisonment and eight years supervised release. We affirm. 3 * Norman argues that the search warrant affidavit contained intentional or reckless misrepresentations that were the basis for the magistrate's probable cause determination. Thus, he concludes, the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress. A. Misleading Statements 4 Evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant…