United States v. Daniel Moses Longoria, Jr.

Good Law
8 F.3d 32·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 34995
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 20, 199393-30085California385 words

Opinion

Opinion

8 F.3d 32 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel Moses LONGORIA, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 93-30085, 93-30086. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 6, 1993. * Decided Oct. 20, 1993. Before: BEEZER, KOZINSKI and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 In these consolidated appeals, Daniel Longoria, Jr., appeals from his 121-month sentence for conspiracy and possession with intent to distribute heroin and cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a), 846. We dismiss the appeals. 3 We lack jurisdiction to review a defendant's appeal from a sentence that falls below the applicable Guidelines range. United States v. Vizcarra-Angulo, 904 F.2d 22, 23 (9th Cir.1990). 4 Here, following Longoria's entry of a guilty plea, the district court originally imposed a 188-month sentence, which was at the low end of the applicable Guidelines range. In return for Longoria's…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.