United States v. Jerry Don Mainard

8 F.3d 32 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jerry Don MAINARD, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10298. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 31, 1993. * Decided Sept. 20, 1993. Before: REAVLEY, ** PREGERSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM *** 2 Jerry Don Mainard appeals his conviction and sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines for conspiracy and aiding and abetting the attempt to manufacture methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1) & 846 and 18 U.S.C. § 2 . Mainard contends that his conviction should be reversed because the district court erred by admitting evidence of other bad acts during his trial and because the district court's answer to the jury's question during its deliberation was inaccurate. Mainard challenges his sentence of 188 months in prison as improper on the grounds that the district court should have adjusted his base offense…