United States v. Noe Gorrula Madrid, United States of America v. Noe Gorrula Madrid

8 F.3d 32 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Noe Gorrula MADRID, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Noe Gorrula MADRID, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 91-30420, 92-30396. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 1, 1993. * Decided Sept. 30, 1993. Before: BROWNING, SCHROEDER, and HALL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Noe Madrid appeals his sentence after a guilty plea to one count of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine. In a separate pro se appeal, Madrid challenges the denial of discovery of grand jury transcripts, which he sought after he filed his appeal. 3 * The district court properly held Madrid accountable for all the drugs and money seized from his coconspirators, rather than just the four and one-half kilos found in his own home. Relevant conduct, for purposes of ascertaining the guideline range, includes all "reasonably…