United States v. Jack John Milojevich

8 F.3d 32 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jack John MILOJEVICH, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-30044. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 6, 1993. * Decided Oct. 21, 1993. Before: BEEZER, KOZINSKI, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jack John Milojevich appeals his conviction following a conditional guilty plea to conspiracy to manufacture, possess with intent to distribute and distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1), 846. Milojevich contends the district court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a search of his telephone call records because the warrant misidentified his number and relied upon uncorroborated and unreliable hearsay of a confidential informant. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review for clear error a magistrate's issuance of a search warrant and will…