United States v. Darlington Edo Idiado, Paul Irabor-Iyangbe, Alhaji Gani-Ganiyu Opolo Majekodunmi, Matthew Enoyoje Onaghise, Bernard Wilson Oyatedor, Iyabo Williams, United States of America v. Samuel Okeowo Orogun

Good Law
8 F.3d 32
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 7, 199392-10107California5,726 words

Opinion

Opinion

8 F.3d 32 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darlington Edo IDIADO, Paul Irabor-Iyangbe, Alhaji Gani-Ganiyu Opolo Majekodunmi, Matthew Enoyoje Onaghise, Bernard Wilson Oyatedor, Iyabo Williams, Defendants-Appellants. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Samuel Okeowo OROGUN, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 92-10056, 92-10091, 92-10072, 92-10107, 92-10106, 92-10075, 92-10126, and 92-10074. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 31, 1993. * Decided Sept. 28, 1993. As Amended Dec. 7, 1993. Before CHOY, D.W. NELSON and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Co-defendants Idiado, Irabor-Iyangbe, Majekodunmi, Onaghise, Orogun, Oyatedor, and Williams appeal their jury convictions and sentences under the Sentencing Guidelines for various offenses arising from a narcotics trafficking operation, including conspiring to import and importing, and conspiring to distribute, heroin in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.