United States v. Richard Ian Silver

8 F.3d 33 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Ian SILVER, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 91-50776, 91-60781. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 8, 1993. Submission Withdrawn June 11, 1993. Resubmitted Aug. 25, 1993. Decided Aug. 30, 1993. Before FLETCHER, POOLE and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Appellant Silver appeals the sentences imposed for mail fraud and counterfeiting violations. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988). We remand for compliance with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(c)(3)(D). However, we reject the contention that imposition of consecutive Guidelines and non-Guidelines sentences constitutes double punishment. 3 Silver pled guilty to three counts of mail fraud and one count of possession of counterfeit government obligations. The mail fraud crimes, violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (1988), charged in second…