United States v. Lawrence E. Wood, United States of America v. Daniel Duchaine

8 F.3d 33 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Lawrence E. WOOD, Defendant/Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Daniel DUCHAINE, Defendant/Appellant. Nos. 92-50512, 92-50514. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 12, 1993. Decided Oct. 21, 1993. Before: GIBSON, * HALL, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Wood and Duchaine appeal their convictions and sentences for various violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 , 371 and 21 U.S.C. § 331 . We affirm. I. BACKGROUND 3 In 1990, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was investigating the distribution of Gamma Hydroxybutyrate (GHB) and Clenbuterol in the United States. 1 In the latter part of 1990, the FDA raided a company located in Arizona known as Amino Discounters. Agents discovered that the company had sent a one-pound package to a residence in Thousand Oaks, California, and that two phone…