United States v. Robert A. Zander

8 F.3d 33 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert A. ZANDER, Defendant-Appellant No. 92-10606. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 2, 1993. Decided Oct. 12, 1993. 1 Before: D.W. NELSON, NORRIS, Circuit Judges, and TANNER, Senior District Judge. * 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Robert A. Zander appeals his jury conviction on three counts of theft and embezzlement from an employee benefit plan under 18 U.S.C. § 664 . We have jurisdiction to hear his appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 4 * Zander first argues that the district court erred in admitting two exhibits that revealed to the jury the extent of the defendant's wealth. He claims that, under Federal Rule of Evidence 403, the two financial statements detailing the net worth both of Zander personally and of one of his businesses should not have been admitted into evidence because they were more prejudicial than…