United States v. David Castle Woolley, AKA D. Castle Wooley

8 F.3d 33 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Castle WOOLLEY, aka D. Castle Wooley, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-10094. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 6, 1993. * Decided Oct. 21, 1993. Before: BEEZER, KOZINSKI, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 David Woolley appeals his 12-year sentence imposed following entry of his guilty plea to the cultivation of more than 1,000 marijuana plants in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 and the use of real property to commit a felony in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 855 . We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we grant counsel's motion to withdraw and affirm the district court's judgment. 3 Counsel for Woolley filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), raising several constitutional challenges to the sentencing enhancement provisions of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (b)(1). Woolley filed a…