United States v. Chana Weeraprajuk

8 F.3d 33 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Chana WEERAPRAJUK, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-30427. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 20, 1993. * Decided Oct. 6, 1993. Before: FLETCHER, POOLE, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Chana Weeraprajuk appeals the 78-month sentence imposed following entry of his guilty plea to importation of heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 5952 (a), 960(a)(1), and 960(b)(2)(A), and possession with intent to distribute heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(B). Weeraprajuk contends that the district court erred by making a two-level upward adjustment in his offense level based upon its finding that he was "an organizer, leader, manager, or supervisor" under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(c). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review for clear error whether a defendant was…