United States v. 360 Frosty Creek Road, Tonasket, Washington, and Anthony F. Zak

8 F.3d 33 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 360 FROSTY CREEK ROAD, TONASKET, WASHINGTON, et al., Defendants, and Anthony F. ZAK, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-35537. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 13, 1993. * Decided Oct. 15, 1993. Before: BEEZER, KOZINSKI and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Anthony F. Zak appeals pro se the district court's denial of his motion to reconsider the denial of his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review the denial of a motion to reconsider for an abuse of discretion, see Molloy v. Wilson, 878 F.2d 313, 315 (9th Cir.1989), and we will reverse "only upon a clear showing of [an] abuse of discretion." Id. Zak's property was forfeited to the United States pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881 (a)(7), which provides that the whole of any lot or tract of land used, in any manner, to…