Darrell B. Warren v. United States

Good Law
8 F.3d 33·1993 WL 321698·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 35265
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 24, 199392-36765California1,267 words

Opinion

Opinion

8 F.3d 33 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Darrell B. WARREN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee. No. 92-36765. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 11, 1993. * Decided Aug. 24, 1993. Before: PREGERSON, BRUNETTI, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Darrell Warren, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion challenging his conviction, following a jury trial, for possession of five grams or more of cocaine base, possession of a firearm during a drug trafficking crime, and being a felon in possession of a firearm. We review de novo, United States v. Angelone, 894 F.2d 1129, 1130 (9th Cir.1990), and affirm. 3 Warren contends that (1) his conviction was obtained by the use of evidence resulting from an unconstitutional search and seizure, (2) his arrest was without probable cause, (3) he was denied the effective assistance of counsel at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.