United States v. Robert D. Widergren, United States of America v. Robert D. Widergren

8 F.3d 33 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert D. WIDERGREN, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert D. WIDERGREN, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 92-10595, 92-10642. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 13, 1993. Decided Aug. 30, 1993. Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, and D.W. NELSON and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM 1 Widergren appeals from his convictions following a jury trial for mail fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1341 , securities fraud, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b) and 17 C.F.R. § 240 .10b-5 (1991), and criminal contempt, 18 U.S.C. § 401 (3). Both Widergren and the government appeal from the sentence imposed by the district court under the United States Sentencing Guidelines (Guidelines). The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3231 . We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C.…