Nir Goldeshtein v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
8 F.3d 645·93 Daily Journal DAR 12967·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 26607·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7593
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 13, 199391-70573, 92-70228 and 92-70711California2,907 words

Opinion

Opinion

Canby, J.

These consolidated cases present the question whether structuring financial transactions with domestic financial institutions to avoid currency reports, in violation of 31 U.S.C. §§ 5324 (a)(3) and 5322(b), is a crime involving moral turpitude within the meaning of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”). We hold that it is not. Accordingly, we grant the petition for review in No. 91-70573, reverse the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), and remand with instructions to terminate the deportation proceedings.

I. FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Nir Goldeshtein is a native and citizen of Israel; he last entered the United States in June 1984. In December 1984, he married Zoe Lawton; she is a United States citizen. On May 30, 1985, on the basis of his marriage, Goldeshtein became a lawful permanent resident of the United States. In March 1989, Goldeshtein pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to violate federal currency laws, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 , and two counts of structuring financial transactions with domestic financial institutions to avoid currency reports, in violation of 31 U.S.C. §§ 5324 (a)(3) and 5322(b) and 18 U.S.C. § 2 . Goldeshtein…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.