United States v. Lissette Christina Nukida

Bad Law
8 F.3d 665·93 Daily Journal DAR 13520·1993 WL 429274·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 27706·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7912
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 26, 199392-50234California4,149 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wallace, J.

The government appeals from a judgment of the district court dismissing five counts of a sixteen count indictment charging that Nukida tampered with consumer products affecting interstate commerce, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1365 (a). In granting Nukida’s Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12(b) motion to dismiss, the district court concluded that the products allegedly tampered with did not then affect interstate commerce, and therefore it lacked subject matter jurisdiction. The government contends the district court exceeded its authority by ruling on the interstate commerce element prior to trial. Nukida counters that the government has waived this argument by failing to raise it in the trial court. The district court initially exercised jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3231 . We have jurisdiction over the government’s timely interlocutory appeal pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3731 . We reverse and remand.

I

Casa Colina Peninsula Rehabilitation Center (Casa Colina) is a medical care facility in Lomita, California. It provides inpatient treatment for patients who require intravenous antibiotic medication, as well as for patients suffering from brain tumors. Conn, Myracks, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.