John v. Torrisi, and James Lazar, Objector-Appellant v. Tucson Electric Power Company, (Two Cases) in Re Tucson Electric Company Securities Litigation. (Two Cases) John v. Torrisi, and Patricia Reilly v. Tucson Electric Power Company Thomas Weir

Good Law
8 F.3d 1370
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 3, 199392-15550California4,645 words

Opinion

Opinion

8 F.3d 1370 Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,816, 27 Fed.R.Serv.3d 349 John V. TORRISI, Plaintiff-Appellee, and James Lazar, Objector-Appellant, v. TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, et al., Defendants-Appellees. (Two Cases) In re TUCSON ELECTRIC COMPANY SECURITIES LITIGATION. (Two Cases) John V. TORRISI, Plaintiff-Appellee, and Patricia Reilly, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY; Thomas Weir, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 92-15550, 92-15556 and 92-15557. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 13, 1993. Decided Nov. 3, 1993. Daniel W. Meek, Portland, OR, for objector-appellant Lazar. Patricia Reilly, pro se for objector-appellant Reilly. Ralph L. Ellis, Abbey & Ellis, Melvyn I. Weiss, Milberg, Weiss, Bershad, Huynes & Lerach, New York City, and Stanley Wolfe, Berger & Montague, Philadelphia, PA, for plaintiffs-appellees. Thomas M. Pace, O'Connor, Cavanagh, Anderson, Westover, Killingsworth & Beshears, liaison counsel for the plaintiff. Charles C. Platt, LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby & MacRae, New York City, and Dennis R. Nelson, Tucson Elec. Power Co., Tucson, AZ, for defendants-appellees. Before: KOZINSKI, THOMPSON and T.G.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.