United States v. Leticia Castaneda, United States of America v. Ismael Barron, United States of America v. Maria Meras, United States of America v. Uriel Castaneda, United States of America v. Terezo De Jesus Umansor-Alvarez, United States of America v. Lucas Ornelas-Martinez (True Name: Jose Licea)

Good Law
9 F.3d 761
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 26, 199392-30077California5,543 words

Opinion

Opinion

9 F.3d 761 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leticia CASTANEDA, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ismael BARRON, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Maria MERAS, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Uriel CASTANEDA, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Terezo de Jesus UMANSOR-ALVAREZ, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lucas ORNELAS-MARTINEZ (True Name: Jose Licea), Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 92-30077, 92-30095 to 92-30097, 92-30102 and 92-30103. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 8, 1993. Decided Oct. 5, 1993. As Amended Oct. 26, 1993. Walter G. Palmer, Peggy Sue Juergens, Seattle, WA, for defendant-appellant Leticia Castaneda. Allan B. Ament, Bellevue, WA, for defendant-appellant Ismael Barron. Antonio Salazar, Salazar Law Offices, Seattle, WA, for defendant-appellant Maria Meras. Erik L. Bauer, Bauer, Parsons & Campbell, Tacoma, WA, for defendant-appellant Uriel Castaneda. Peter A. Camiel, Mair, Abercrombie, Camiel, and Rummonds, Seattle, WA, for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.