The Vollrath Company v. Sammi Corporation Ken Carter Industries, Inc. Sammisa (America) Corp.

Good Law
9 F.3d 1455·93 Daily Journal DAR 14981·1993 WL 485659·27 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 618·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 30963
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 29, 199390-55201California4,391 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hug, J.

Vollrath Company (‘Vollrath”) appeals the district court’s order granting the defendants’ motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict in Vollrath’s antitrust action. Vollrath contends there was sufficient evidence from which the jury could have concluded that the defendants violated sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act by a predatory pricing scheme for stainless steel mixing bowls and by restricting output in Korea of stainless steel steamer cookware. Vollrath further contends there was sufficient evidence from which the jury could reasonably have concluded the defendants’ pricing of the stainless steel mixing bowls violated the California Unfair Trade Practices Act. Vollrath also asserts that the district court erred when it barred Vollrath from amending its complaint to allege a claim for tortious interference with a contractual and business relationship. We affirm the district court’s judgment.

I.

FACTS

The parties to this dispute include a number of corporations engaged in the manufacture and distribution of stainless steel mixing bowls and steamers. Vollrath, a Wisconsin company, was engaged in the business of importing stainless steel steamers and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.