Abed Ashoor Ajeel v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Opinion
Opinion
9 F.3d 1550 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Abed Ashoor AJEEL, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 92-70315. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 7, 1993. * Decided Oct. 14, 1993. 1 Before: HALL and RYMER, Circuit Judges, and FITZGERALD, ** District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Abed Ashoor Ajeel petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA). Ajeel argues that the BIA erred in denying his motion for remand to the immigration judge (IJ) and in affirming the decision of the IJ that he is not eligible for political asylum or withholding of deportation. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1105a, and we deny the petition for review. 4 * Ajeel first argues that the BIA erred by denying his motion for remand to the IJ to apply for suspension of deportation under § 244(a)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. § 1254 (a)(1). He contends…