Jose Francisco Arroyo-Alatorre v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
9 F.3d 1550·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 36190
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 14, 199392-70307California1,934 words

Opinion

Opinion

9 F.3d 1550 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jose Francisco ARROYO-ALATORRE, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 92-70307. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 7, 1993. * Decided Oct. 14, 1993. 1 Before: HALL and RYMER, Circuit Judges, and FITZGERALD, ** District Judge 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Jose Francisco Arroyo-Alatorre petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA). Arroyo argues that in denying his petition for a waiver of deportation under § 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (c), the BIA failed to properly consider the equities and hardships weighing in his favor, erred in requiring him to show outstanding equities, and erred in determining that he had not shown outstanding equities. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1105a, and we deny the petition for review. 4 * Arroyo argues that the BIA failed properly to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.