Canatella v. Jamison

9 F.3d 1550 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Richard A. CANATELLA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bruce JAMISON, Recorder of the City and County of San Francisco; Michael Hennessey, Sheriff, City and County of San Francisco; Joyce Marie Sawaya, Certified Shorthand Reporter Inc.; Robert L. Mezzetti, II; Mezzetti Law Firm; Susan Myers, Clerk of the Municipal Court of CA, Santa Clara Co. Judicial District; City and County of San Francisco Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-15375. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 6, 1993. * Decided Oct. 14, 1993. Before: FERGUSON, THOMPSON and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** OVERVIEW 2 Richard A. Canatella appeals the district court's dismissal of his claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , and its denial of his motion for leave to file a second amended complaint. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. STANDARDS OF REVIEW 3 The existence of subject matter jurisdiction is a…