Jack E. Fetter v. United States of America Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service

Good Law
9 F.3d 1551·1993 WL 460962·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 36181
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 10, 199393-35054California243 words

Opinion

Opinion

9 F.3d 1551 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jack E. FETTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service, Defendants-Appellee. No. 93-35054. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 27, 1993. * Decided Nov. 10, 1993. Before: CHOY, GOODWIN, SKOPIL, Circuit Judges. 1 ORDER ** 2 The judgment of the district court dismissing this action for want of subject matter jurisdiction is affirmed for the reasons stated in the judgment appealed from. Because this appeal is frivolous, unfounded in law, and was brought after due notice and warning that further frivolous appeals in this matter would subject the appellant to financial sanctions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1912 , the appellant shall pay to the treasurer of the United States the sum of $1,500.00 as a civil sanction for filing a frivolous appeal. 3 The mandate will issue now, and no petition for rehearing will be received for filing. * The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.