Manuel Domingo Edmondson v. Brian Gunn, Warden Jerome Di Maggio Department of Corrections Attorney General of California Dan Lungren
Opinion
Opinion
9 F.3d 1551 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Manuel Domingo EDMONDSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Brian GUNN, Warden; Jerome Di Maggio; Department of Corrections; Attorney General of California; Dan Lungren, Respondents-Appellees. Nos. 92-56467, 92-56470. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 20, 1993. * Decided Oct. 26, 1993. Before: BEEZER, KOZINSKI, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 California state prisoner Manuel D. Edmondson appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his two consolidated habeas petitions, challenging his conviction and sentence for two counts of second degree murder for deaths arising from an auto accident in which Edmondson was driving under the influence of alcohol. Edmondson claims there was insufficient evidence of implied malice to support his murder convictions, and the trial court erred in imposing two consecutive terms of 15 years to life. We review de novo the district court's denial…