Juanita Childs v. Painewebber Incorporated

Good Law
9 F.3d 1551·1993 WL 460689·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 36182
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 8, 199392-16894California1,294 words

Opinion

Opinion

9 F.3d 1551 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Juanita CHILDS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PAINEWEBBER INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-16894. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 1, 1993. * Decided Nov. 8, 1993. Before: SCHROEDER, D.W. NELSON, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Juanita Childs appeals pro se the district court's judgment confirming an underlying arbitration award rendered by the National Association of Securities Dealers ("NASD") in favor of defendant Painewebber, Inc., and dismissing Childs's action as barred by the applicable statute of limitations. Childs alleged that Painewebber violated section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 by fraudulently soliciting and selling unsuitable investments, and making material misstatements and omissions with respect to her investments made in her Painewebber account. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.