Gargani v. Reno

9 F.3d 1551 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Gary R. GARGANI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Janet RENO, ** U.S. Atty. General; J. Quinlin, Director of B.O.P.; Al Kanahele, Warden, MCC, San Diego, California; R. Hayden, Doctor, Chief Health & Safety Officer; James E. MacSweeney, Contract Doctor, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-55115. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 1, 1993. * Decided Nov. 8, 1993. Before: SCHROEDER, D.W. NELSON, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM *** 2 Gary R. Gargani, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of the defendants, prison officials and a contract doctor, in his action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). The district court determined that Gargani had not proffered evidence sufficient to show that the defendants were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction…