Georgia Henson v. John Florez, Robert Kinoshita, and Joe Cuccia

Good Law
9 F.3d 1551·1993 WL 440998·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 36178
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 1, 199392-15771California1,478 words

Opinion

Opinion

9 F.3d 1551 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Georgia HENSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John FLOREZ, Robert Kinoshita, and Joe Cuccia, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-15771. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 8, 1993. * Decided Nov. 1, 1993. Before: HUG, FARRIS, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 This appeal involves a lawsuit filed by Georgia Henson under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against her Supervisors, John Florez, Robert Kinoshita, and Joe Cuccia, who insisted that she provide a medical diagnosis to justify her use of sick leave. The district court granted the Supervisors' motion for summary judgment on the grounds of qualified immunity. We have jurisdiction of the timely appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm. 3 Henson was employed in the California Department of Social Services and was absent from her employment, claiming that she was ill and entitled to sick leave. She refused to provide information…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.