Howard Marcus v. B. Aispuro J. Cannon

9 F.3d 1552 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Howard MARCUS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. B. AISPURO Defendant, J. Cannon, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-15575. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 1, 1993. * Decided Nov. 9, 1993. Before: SCHROEDER, D.W. NELSON, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Howard Marcus appeals pro se the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant's in Marcus's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 prisoner civil rights action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review the district court's grant of summary judgment de novo, see Jones v. Union Pac. R.R., 968 F.2d 937, 940 (9th Cir.1992), and affirm. 3 Marcus contends that the district court improperly granted summary judgment on his claim that prison officials were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs by failing to obtain x-rays or prescribe other diagnostic tests after he injured his back in a fall. We…