Anthony Paul Leonardelli v. William Huston, A.S.P.C. Warden

9 F.3d 1552 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Anthony Paul LEONARDELLI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William HUSTON, A.S.P.C. Warden; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-15810. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 20, 1993. * Decided Oct. 29, 1993. Before: BEEZER, KOZINSKI, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Anthony Paul Leonardelli, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's order granting summary judgment for the appellees and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Leonardelli claims that the appellees denied him meaningful access to the courts by not providing: (1) sufficient access to the prison law library; (2) free postage for mailing legal documents to the courts; and (3) free photocopying of legal documents. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review de novo the grant of summary judgment. Hopkins v. Andaya, 958 F.2d 881, 884 (9th Cir.1992) (per…