Sue Monroe v. City of Kent

9 F.3d 1552 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Sue MONROE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF KENT, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-36920. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 20, 1993. * Decided Oct. 29, 1993. Before: BEEZER, KOZINSKI and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Federal prisoner Sue Monroe appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of the City of Kent in Monroe's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging violations of her civil rights while she was housed in the City of Kent Correctional Facility. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm. 3 We review de novo the district court's summary judgment. Harper v. Wallingford, 877 F.2d 728, 731 (9th Cir.1989). "We must decide, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court correctly applied the relevant law." Alaska Airlines,…