Wayiha Yanez Lambarri Enrique Lambarri Romero v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
9 F.3d 1552·1993 WL 441004·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 36130
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 29, 199393-70249California873 words

Opinion

Opinion

9 F.3d 1552 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Wayiha Yanez LAMBARRI; Enrique Lambarri Romero, Petitioners, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 93-70249. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 20, 1993. * Decided Oct. 29, 1993. Before: BEEZER, KOZINSKI, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Wayiha Yanez Lambarri and Enrique Lambarri-Romero, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order affirming the immigration judge's ("IJ") decision finding petitioners deportable as charged and denying their request for voluntary departure on the ground that they were statutorily ineligible for such relief. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a). We review de novo an agency's interpretation of a statute. Braun v. INS, 992 F.2d 1016, 1018 (9th Cir.1993). We review the BIA's factual finding of statutory ineligibility for substantial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.