Eugene Soliz, Husband Frances Soliz, Wife v. Murphy, Goering, Roberts & Berkman, P.C.

9 F.3d 1553 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Eugene SOLIZ, husband; Frances Soliz, wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MURPHY, GOERING, ROBERTS & BERKMAN, P.C.; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-55604. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 20, 1993. * Decided Oct. 29, 1993. Before: BEEZER, KOZINSKI, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Eugene and Frances Soliz appeal pro se the district court's dismissal of their diversity action for failure to state a claim pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). We review de novo the district court's dismissal for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Oscar v. University Students Co-op. Ass'n, 965 F.2d 783, 785 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 655 (1992). We affirm. 3 The Solizes have filed a series of lawsuits in connection with a 1988 automobile accident. On August 12, 1992, they filed this action, naming as defendant Murphy, Goering, Roberts &…