John H. Todd v. Kenneth E. Jones Edward Irvin W. Rand Schuft Martin J. Sorenson Michael C. Jenkins

9 F.3d 1553 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. John H. TODD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kenneth E. JONES; Edward Irvin; W. Rand Schuft; Martin J. Sorenson; Michael C. Jenkins; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-16681. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 20, 1993. * Decided Oct. 29, 1993. Before: BEEZER, KOZINSKI, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 John Todd appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment and order of dismissal under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) in favor of the defendants, various Nevada law enforcement authorities and parole authorities, in Todd's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo. Jones v. Union Pacific R.R., 968 F.2d 937, 940 (9th Cir.1992) (summary judgment); Woodrum v. Woodard County, Okl., 866 F.2d 1121 , 1124 (9th Cir.1989) (failure to state a claim). We affirm. 3 Todd was arrested by Eureka County, Nevada law enforcement…