Schaefer v. Williams
Opinion
Opinion
9 F.3d 1553 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert Eugene SCHAEFER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dick WILLIAMS, in his individual capacity and as Sheriff of San Bernardino County; San Bernardino County; S. Urban, Officer in his individual capacity and as deputy sheriff of San Bernardino County; Sharon Fletcher, Officer in her individual capacity and as a Police Officer of the City of Yucaipa; City of Yucaipa, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-55532. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 1, 1993. * Decided Nov. 8, 1993. Before: SCHROEDER, D.W. NELSON, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Robert Eugene Schaefer appeals pro se the district court's dismissal for failure to state a claim of his action challenging his arrest for driving without a valid driver's license or vehicle registration. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review de novo the district court's dismissal of an action pursuant to…